10 best albums of 2008 that you have probably haven’t heard (Part 4)

jordan

Trouble in Dreams by Destroyer

While many of the other albums on this list are, in my opinion, among the best albums released in 2008, “Trouble in Dreams” is likely the only one that would appear on the list of my favorite albums of all time. As a few of you already know, I can talk about Destroyer — and this album specifically — for hours, so I’ll try to keep this pretty brief (at least shorter than my earlier, lengthy Adventureland review). For those of you (un)fortunate enough not to already know this — and, I’d imagine, for the vast majority of people, in general — Destroyer is the work of Dan Bejar, who more people are likely to know as one of the singers in the always-enjoyable The New Pornographers.

I made a promise to myself that I would never recommend Destroyer to any of my friends, as I’ve yet to meet anyone who loves Destroyer as much as I do (in fact, most of the people I know seem to barely tolerate it when I’m listening). But, since this isn’t a recommendation, I have no problem with telling you how fantastic Destroyer and “Trouble in Dreams” are. And in the interest of keeping this short, I’ll tell you that the four Destroyer albums before “Trouble in Dreams” (”Streethawk: A Seduction,” “This Night,” “Your Blues,” and “Destroyer’s Rubies”) are all amazing and drastically different albums, each of which is very effective at accomplishing its desired effect. With that in mind, I think that “Trouble in Dreams” is a masterpiece, and one of the best albums ever made.

Like most Destroyer albums, “Trouble in Dreams” evolves as you listen to the album over and over. Upon first listen, one or two songs stand out. On the third listen, four or five songs. By the fifth or so listen, I found myself astounded at how the album I was listening to was not the same album I’d listened to four previous times — every song has amazing moments (even short ones, that you find yourself eagerly awaiting on each listen), evoking varying emotional responses and blending together with the rest of album (that at first seemed so disconnected). The album is called “Trouble in Dreams,” and indeed the music and lyrics reflect a sort of dreamlike or spiritual mood, emphasized by the pervasive, rhythmic drumming that starts to stand out after the first few listens.

Growing up, I can remember listening to countless songs on the radio, cassette, or old records belonging to my parents, and creating, in my mind, what seemed like the most likely lyrics. Even though these were usually wrong, they held meaning to me, as they were part of my unique experience of each piece of music; this wasn’t because my lyrics were better (I’m pretty sure they rarely even made sense), but because those lyrics had grown to have some meaning to me. When I later discovered what the actual lyrics were (thanks, Internet), I usually felt disappointed, and my response to the music afterwards was (at least slightly) different for having this information. In contrast to this, Dan Bejar’s lyrics are always crystal clear, and there is no doubt as to what he is saying. However, as Bejar has said, the lyrics on “Trouble in Dreams” generally don’t mean anything, but are really just combinations of words intended to create a mood or evoke some response. And in this respect, they are very effective. Each listener will associate the lyrics differently in his or her mind, and be able to a create a completely unique experience for him/herself.

Immediate Catchiness: 1/5
Long-Term Playability: 6/5
Favorite Tracks: every track…

4 Responses to “10 best albums of 2008 that you have probably haven’t heard (Part 4)”

  1. corinne Says:
    April 20th, 2009 at 7:40 pm

    I’ve probably heard most of the Destroyer songs simply from Jordy listening to them, and so far, I belong in the category of “barely tolerate”, although, maybe not that harsh…I just haven’t found most of it appealing. I will say, when I heard Streethawk: A Seduction, I definitely found it listenable, and it grew on me the more I listened to it; however, that album is probably the closest to his stuff with The New Pornographers, so it would make sense that I like that the most.

    What is it about Destroyer that I don’t find appealing? — I’ve never been able to put my finger on it. I’ve even found myself singing along to parts of songs, while still not really enjoying the music. Bejar’s voice is strange, but I’m typically okay with strange voices (in fact, I often prefer something more unusual). The only thing I’ve ever really been able to say about it is that I don’t like the way he sings. What’s strange is that there are many other singers who sing in a way that many other people wouldn’t like, and I still like those singers. So why not Bejar? I just don’t know.

    Aside from not really being a big fan of the final outcome of the music produced by Destroyer, I have to say that I find the use of lyrics in the music very interesting. As you said, the lyrics don’t really mean anything — it’s more like a string of words that are supposed to evoke a feeling from the listener, purely based on their sound (unless repeating “foam hands” in a song actually means something..). However, a band/musician writing lyrics in this way doesn’t make it better for me as a listener, I just think it’s an interesting take on what music is “for”.

    One more thing — I noticed that you gave this album a 1/5 for immediate catchiness, and I know we’ve discussed that point in great detail. I remember you saying you liked the album more (almost appreciated it more) because it wasn’t immediately catchy, and you had to keep listening to it to understand/enjoy it. To this, I disagreed. While I can’t judge an album based off of my 1st or 2nd listen, I don’t think the fact that it takes me a while to like an album makes it any better than an album I like immediately. In fact, I think there is something to be said for an album I like immediately and still manages to have excellent long-term playability. This probably all goes into the same idea as mentioned before in the Adventureland review comments: people watch movies for different reasons, and people also listen to music for different reasons. So, while some may find it appealing to work harder to enjoy an album, others may not.

  2. jordan Says:
    April 20th, 2009 at 10:28 pm

    Like you said, I think that people listen to music for lots of reasons. One of these reasons, for me, is because I find it interesting that my brain can hear the exact same piece of music multiple times, yet get something completely different out of it each time. I certainly appreciate albums that are both immediately catchy and infinitely listenable (”Exile on Main St.” was/is certainly that for me, and is easily one of my favorite albums), but I find it compelling when a static piece of art can evolve over time.

    Take Arrested Development, which I know we both love (who wouldn’t?). You watch the show one time through, and it’s hilarious. You watch the show a second time, and you notice a lot of the hidden references to the Fox network and events surrounding the show’s production. After the third watch, you notice all of the references to future events and episodes in the show (”I never thought I’d miss a hand so much.”), etc. The same goes for Destroyer albums — each listen reveals more and changes your perceptions of the album. Although the show/album itself isn’t changing, your perception of it is, and I find that to be immensely intriguing.

  3. jared Says:
    April 20th, 2009 at 11:30 pm

    I still haven’t given Destroyer a true listen. A few songs have come on shuffle now and then, but nothing more. So, like Adventureland, I can’t comment on the music itself, unfortunately.

    I’d say the problem with your analogy (for me, at least) is that I would still give Arrested Development a 5/5 for immediate catchiness. You might catch new things as you watch it again and again, but you’ll be praising it the first time you watch it, as well.

    A little off topic, but I think it’s music like Destroyer’s (or any of this list’s, for that matter) that proves the internet’s value. As you’ve alluded to with your title (albums you probably haven’t heard of), their music isn’t necessarily popular, but, nonetheless, I can find a number of videos or samples of his songs online, and use any number of digital retailers to buy an album if I want.

  4. jordan Says:
    April 20th, 2009 at 11:53 pm

    I agree Jared, and contrary to what so many record companies seem to think, this means that I end up spending more money buying albums. Before I had listened to any Destroyer, I was unlikely to dish out $9 (online) or $15 (at a record store) on an album, having no assurance whatsoever that I’d like it. Once I’d previewed a few tracks (in the case of Destroyer, the song “Hey, Snow White” initially got me hooked), I ended up legally purchasing much more.

    I’m constantly perplexed by how stupid these companies seem to be. At Amazon, the CD and MP3 teams have to enforce the 30-second preview rule, presumably because people could just keep clicking the little play button on each track, in their browsers, over and over. Well, at the same time, those people could just go to YouTube (or a similar site) to listen to the entire song, and they likely do this instead (I know I do). As a company wanting to make money off this music, wouldn’t you want to keep customers on the site that allows for song/album purchases? I’ve noticed little “Buy on iTunes/Amazon MP3″ ads on some YouTube videos recently — what is the difference?

Leave a Reply

Entries RSS Comments RSS Log in
Icons by N.Design Studio. Designed By Ben Swift. Powered by WordPress, Search Optimization and Free WordPress Themes